Abstract

Surveillance for biosecurity hazards is being conducted by the New Zealand Competent Authority, the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) to support New Zealand's biosecurity system. Surveillance evaluation should be an integral part of the surveillance life cycle, as it provides a means to identify and correct problems and to sustain and enhance the existing strengths of a surveillance system. The surveillance evaluation Framework (SurF) presented here was developed to provide a generic framework within which the MPI biosecurity surveillance portfolio, and all of its components, can be consistently assessed. SurF is an innovative, cross-sectoral effort that aims to provide a common umbrella for surveillance evaluation in the animal, plant, environment and aquatic sectors. It supports the conduct of the following four distinct components of an evaluation project: (i) motivation for the evaluation, (ii) scope of the evaluation, (iii) evaluation design and implementation and (iv) reporting and communication of evaluation outputs. Case studies, prepared by MPI subject matter experts, are included in the framework to guide users in their assessment. Three case studies were used in the development of SurF in order to assure practical utility and to confirm usability of SurF across all included sectors. It is anticipated that the structured approach and information provided by SurF will not only be of benefit to MPI but also to other New Zealand stakeholders. Although SurF was developed for internal use by MPI, it could be applied to any surveillance system in New Zealand or elsewhere.

Highlights

  • The New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) undertakes and invests significantly in a range of national biosecurity surveillance activities across the plant, animal, environmental and aquatic sectors (Acosta & White, 2011)

  • The importance of understanding, and being able to assess, the quality of surveillance programmes was a focus of New Zealand’s Biosecurity Surveillance Strategy 2020 (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry [MAF], 2009), which identified three strategic goals related to the delivery of quality surveillance:

  • A surveillance evaluation framework was developed based on these findings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) undertakes and invests significantly in a range of national biosecurity surveillance activities across the plant, animal, environmental and aquatic sectors (Acosta & White, 2011). Biosecurity surveillance aims to detect hazards such as infectious disease agents or introduced pests and inform their management. It is thereby part of the larger biosecurity system aimed at reducing biosecurity risks and facilitating trade. These activities underpin New Zealand’s ability to enable trade. The importance of understanding, and being able to assess, the quality of surveillance programmes was a focus of New Zealand’s Biosecurity Surveillance Strategy 2020 (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry [MAF], 2009), which identified three strategic goals related to the delivery of quality surveillance:

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call