Abstract
The Supreme Court Rules, 2013 have been framed under the powers vested in the Hon’ble Court under Article 145 of the Constitution of India and come in force with the approval of the Hon’ble President of India. This Article attempts to show that some of the Rules and the Practices in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India are not aligned with the Constitution of India. Illustratively a) Summary Determinations in Appeals b) Review Jurisdiction – Procedures [Motion for Reconsideration in US, UK etc.] A suggestion for revision of the rules is being made in this article so as to align them with the Constitutional principles including promoting Justice – Preamble and Article 38 of the Constitution. The current Review Jurisdiction, at a conceptual level, is focused on finality of a Judgment and not on delivery of Justice. This is reflected by the Explanation inserted in Order XLVIII Rule 1 in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. This explanation is included in the Supreme Court Rules 2013 by virtue of Order XLVIII Rule 1 of these rules. This piece is being written as part of the Fundamental Duty of this Citizen – Article 51A: Clauses (a), (j) and (h).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.