Abstract
The last few days of the U.S. Supreme Court term usually include headliner cases, and this year was no different with the affirmative action admissions cases and the Court's decision permitting a web‐designer to limit wedding services based on religious beliefs. Relatively speaking, the Court's decision on a religious accommodations case, Groff v. DeJoy, Postmaster General, S. Ct. Case 22‐174, June 29, 2023, flew under the radar. And while religious accommodations issues don’t arise frequently in athletics, when they do, athletics administrators must be thoughtful and work with legal counsel to evaluate legal obligations. Moreover, recent Supreme Court decisions concerning other religious freedoms have raised the profile of religious and associated rights, which will probably result in religious accommodations and religious freedom issues becoming more frequent throughout college campuses.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
