Abstract

The Court should reject the Federal Circuit’s new, restrictive approach to patent eligibility because it is in conflict with the statute, the precedents of this Court, and sound public policy. The Federal Circuit’s narrow interpretation of patent eligibility strikes first at excluding patents in the area of business methods and software, in direct conflict with the Court’s decision in Diehr. Worse still, the Federal Circuit’s approach could easily cast a pall over all method claims in other areas of technology. Given the long established links between the eligibility rules for software and biotech, it is likely to spread its tentacles to biotech in particular, thereby undermining the huge boost that the Court’s decision in Chakrabarty gave to bioscience. Furthermore, the Federal Circuit’s approach will have a profound adverse effect on the public’s ability to benefit from Dr. Chakrabarty’s own research.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.