Suprascapular nerve decompression in addition to rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized observational trial

Abstract

Tear and retraction of the supraspinatus (SS)and infraspinatus (IS) musculotendinous units and/or their repair may be associated with traction damage to the suprascapular nerve, potentially responsible for pain or weakness of the rotator cuff (RC). Arthroscopic release of the transverse scapular ligament at the suprascapular notch has been advocated to prevent or treat suprascapular nerve impairment associated with RC retraction and/or repair. The effect of this procedure on preoperative normal nerve function is, however, not well studied.We hypothesize that (1) decompression of the suprascapular nerve without preoperative pathologicneurophysiological findings will not improve clinical or imaging outcome and (2) suprascapular decompression will not measurably change suprascapular nerve function. Nineteen consecutive patients with amagnetic resonance arthrography documented RC tear involving SS and IS but normal preoperative electromyography (EMG)/nerve conduction studies of the SS and ISwere enrolled in a prospective, controlled trial involving RC repair with or without suprascapular nerve decompression at the suprascapular notch. Nine patients were randomized to undergo, and 10 not to undergo, a decompression of the suprascapular nerve. Patients were assessed clinically (Constant score, mobility, pain, strength, subjective shoulder value), with magnetic resonance imaging and neurophysiology preoperatively and at 3- and 12-monthfollow-up. There was no clinically relevant difference between the release and the non-release group in any clinical parameter at any time point. At magnetic resonance imaging, there was a slightly greater increase of fatty infiltration of the IS in the release group without any other differences between the 2 groups. Electromyographically, there were no pathologicfindings in the non-release group at any time point. Conversely, 3 of the 9 patients of the release group showed pathologicEMG findings at 3 months, of whom 2 had recovered fully and 1 only partially at 12 months. In the presence of normal EMG findings, suprascapular nerve release added to arthroscopic RC repair is not associated with any clinical benefit, but with electromyographically documented, postoperative impairment of nerve function in 1 of 3 cases. Suprascapular nerve release does not therefore seem to be justified as an adjunct to RC repair if preoperative EMG findings document normal suprascapular nerve function. Based on these findings, the ongoing prospective randomized trial was terminated.