Abstract

Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. has become one of the most abundant grass weeds in Europe. High percentages of winter-annual crops in the rotation, earlier sowing of winter wheat and non-inversion tillage favor A.myosuroides. Additionally, many populations in Europe have developed resistance to acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase), acetolactate synthase (ALS) and photosynthetic (PSII) inhibitors. Hence, yield losses due to A.myosuroides have increased. On-farm studies have been carried out in Southern Germany over five years to investigate abundance, control efficacies and crop yield losses due to A.myosuroides. Three crop rotations were established with varying proportions of winter- and summer-annual crops. The crop rotations had a share of 0, 25 and 50% of summer-annual crops. Within each crop rotation, three herbicide strategies were tested. In contrast to classical herbicidal mixtures and sequences, the aim of one of the herbicide strategies was to keep selection pressure as low as possible by using each mode of action (MOA) only once during the five years. A.myosuroides population was susceptible to all herbicide at the beginning of the experiment. Initial average density was 14 plants m−2. In the rotation with only winter-annual crops, density increased to 5347 ears m−2 in the untreated control plots. Densities were lower in the rotations with 25% and even lower with 50% summer-annual crops. Control efficacies against A. myosuroides in the herbicide strategy using only MOAs of the HRAC-groups B and A, according to the Herbicide Resistance Action Committee (HRAC) classification on MOA, dropped after five years compared to the strategy of changing MOA in every year. Nevertheless, the results demonstrate the need for combining preventive and direct weed-management strategies to suppress A.myosuroides and maintain high weed-control efficacies of the herbicides.

Highlights

  • Crop rotations can be very effective at controlling weeds in Integrated Weed Management (IWM) [1]

  • A. myosuroides density was relatively low at the beginning of the experiment with an average density of 14 ears m−2

  • Densities significantly increased in all three rotations in the untreated control plots (HS1) (Figures 1 and 2, and Table 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Crop rotations can be very effective at controlling weeds in Integrated Weed Management (IWM) [1]. Crop diversity has decreased by 50–70% in European cropping systems within the past 50 years. This is due to the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides [2]. Production of spring cereals, potatoes, fiber crops and legumes has decreased, whereas production of winter cereals, oilseed rape and maize has increased. Winter barley and winter oilseed rape are dominant in moderate and humid areas with often 75–100% winter-annual crops in the rotations [3]. Winter cereals realizes higher yield output than spring cereals and achieve higher contribution margins [4]. The combination of cost reduction due to a minimized cultivation and a herbicide-related system used as described by Power and Follet [5], made the system sustainable

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call