Supportive care and chemotherapy (CT) versus supportive care alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A meta-analysis using individual patient data (IPD) from randomised clinical trials (RCTs)

Abstract

7582 Background: Building on a previous IPD meta-analysis of CT (BMJ 1995;311:899–909) which suggested that CT may have a role in the treatment of NSCLC, we have carried out a new, up-to-date IPD meta-analysis. This includes RCTs, regimens and outcomes that were not available in 1995. This new meta-analysis examines the role of CT in 7 treatment comparisons. Here we report the effectiveness of supportive care plus CT compared with supportive care alone. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for RCTs followed by the central collection, checking and re-analysis of updated IPD. Results from individual RCTs were combined using the stratified (by trial) log rank test to calculate individual and pooled hazard ratios (HRs). Previously included RCTs using long-term alkylating agents were excluded from this analysis due to their antiquity. Results: IPD were obtained on 2,666 patients from 15 RCTs. 11 RCTs used cisplatin-based CT regimens, 4 RCTs used single agent CT (etoposide, navelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel). This added 6 RCTs and 1,702 patients to the 1995 analyses. The results show a highly significant benefit of CT on survival (HR=0.78 95% Confidence Interval 0.71–0.84, p<0.000001), with an absolute benefit of 8% (from 20% to 28%) at 12 months across all patients. There was no evidence of a difference in effect (p=0.69) between trials that used cisplatin-based regimens (11 RCTs, HR=0.76), etoposide alone (1 RCT, HR=0.87) or newer single agents (3 RCTs, HR=0.79) (Interaction p=0.69). There was no evidence that any patient subgroup defined by age, sex, stage or histology benefited more or less from CT. The absolute benefit of CT at 12 months did vary according to WHO/ECOG (or equivalent) performance status. PS 0=8% (from 26% to 34%), PS 1=8% (from 18% to 26%), PS 2=5% (from 6% to 11%) and PS 3=4% (from 5% to 9%). Conclusion: The results demonstrate a substantial and consistent relative benefit of CT in advanced NSCLC. The effectiveness of newer agents such as navelbine, paclitaxel and gemcitabine (used as single agents) appears to be similar to that of cisplatin combined with older agents such as vindesine and mitomycin C. The absolute effect of CT varied according to performance status. No significant financial relationships to disclose.