Abstract

Structure-driven fragment-based (SDFB) approaches have provided efficient methods for the identification of novel drug candidates. This strategy has been largely applied in discovering several pharmacological ligand classes, including enzyme inhibitors, receptor antagonists and, more recently, also allosteric (positive and negative) modulators. Recently, Siegal and collaborators reported an interesting study, performed on a detergent-solubilized StaR adenosine A2A receptor, describing the existence of both fragment-like negative allosteric modulators (NAMs), and fragment-like positive allosteric modulators (PAMs). From this retrospective study, our results suggest that Supervised Molecular Dynamics (SuMD) simulations can support, on a reasonable time scale, the identification of fragment-like PAMs following their receptor recognition pathways and characterizing the possible allosteric binding sites.

Highlights

  • Structure-driven fragment-based (SDFB) approaches have provided efficient methods for the design of novel pharmacological probes as well as drug candidates [1]

  • Protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has stimulated an intensive campaign to identify new classes of hit-candidates different from conventional agonists and antagonists, in particular considering the breakthroughs coming from G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) crystallographic determination that has resulted in a fast-growing number of structures obtained as complexes with allosteric modulators

  • It is useful to underline the Allosteric Database (ASD) repository that it has been developed to provide comprehensive information characterizing allosteric regulation ranging from allosteric proteins, modulators of interactions, sites, Molecules 2017, 22, 818; doi:10.3390/molecules22050818

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Structure-driven fragment-based (SDFB) approaches have provided efficient methods for the design of novel pharmacological probes as well as drug candidates [1]. At the end have of recently reported an alternative computational method, Molecular of each Dynamics time window collected are fitted into a linear function f(x) = mx and a (SuMD),distance that allowspoints investigating the ligand-receptor recognition pathway on a nanoseconds time scaleis[11,12,13]. The applicability domain of our methodology, we selected two fragment-like adenosine A2A receptor exploring their possible recognition pathways by performing SuMD simulations in the absence and in PAMs (see Table 1) exploring their possible recognition pathways by performing SuMD simulations presenceinofthe theabsence From this retrospective ourretrospective results suggest in presence of the NECA agonist.

Results
SuMD Simulations of ZB1854 on the APO Form of A2A AR
SuMDFragment
K153 interacts with
SuMD Simulations of ZB268 on A2A AR in Orthosteric Complex with NECA
Discussion
General
Systems Preparation
Ligand Parameterization
Solvated System Setup and Equilibration
Metadynamics Simulations

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.