Abstract

BackgroundSupported self‐management (SSM) is a recognized approach for people with long‐term conditions but, despite the prevalence of unmet needs, little is known about its role for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI).ObjectivesTo codesign an SSM intervention with people with TBI and evaluate feasibility of implementation through multidisciplinary staff across a trauma pathway.Setting and participantsPeople who had previously been admitted to a Major Trauma Centre following TBI and family members participated in a series of codesign activities. Staff attended SSM workshops and used the intervention with patients in acute and rehabilitation settings.MethodsWe used Normalization Process Theory constructs to guide and interpret implementation. Knowledge, beliefs and confidence of staff in SSM were assessed through pre‐ and post‐training questionnaires, and staff, patients' and families' experiences were explored through semi‐structured interviews. Qualitative data were analysed thematically, and clinical measures were mapped against a matched sample.ResultsCodesigned resources were created and used within an SSM approach for which 110 staff participated in training. Evaluation demonstrated significant differences in staff SSM confidence and skills, following training. Qualitative evaluation revealed adoption by staff, and patients' and families' experiences of using the resources. Challenges included reaching staff across complex pathways to achieve collective implementation.ConclusionThis is the first project to demonstrate feasibility of SSM for people after TBI starting in an acute trauma setting. Through an open approach to codesign with a marginalized group, the SSM resources were valued by them and held meaning and relevance for staff.

Highlights

  • Supported self‐management (SSM) is a recognized approach for people with long‐term conditions but, despite the prevalence of unmet needs, little is known about its role for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI)

  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI), defined as an alteration in brain function or other brain pathology caused by an external force,[2] is a leading cause of disability in working‐age adults.[3]

  • We considered codesign to refer to “patients and carers working in partnership with staff to improve services”.24,p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Supported self‐management (SSM) is a recognized approach for people with long‐term conditions but, despite the prevalence of unmet needs, little is known about its role for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Objectives: To codesign an SSM intervention with people with TBI and evaluate fea‐ sibility of implementation through multidisciplinary staff across a trauma pathway. Traumatic brain injury (TBI), defined as an alteration in brain function or other brain pathology caused by an external force,[2] is a leading cause of disability in working‐age adults.[3] Good physical recovery usually allows discharge directly home from the acute setting, with referral to inpatient rehabilitation services for a minority.[4] Though an injury may be clinically categorized as “mild,” individuals can go on to experience longer‐term cognitive, psychological, emotional and social effects, frequently resulting in “hidden disability”.5. Families navigate a complex, changing sit‐ uation that may include mood disturbances associated with their relative's injury, shifts in family relationships and changes in fi‐ nancial resources.[6] People who are discharged from hospital after TBI are often referred to as “walking wounded,” a label which can diminish the broad impacts and need for adaptation to challenges in everyday life.[7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.