Abstract

Substantial increases in the pace, scale, and effectiveness of conservation will be required to abate the ongoing loss of global biodiversity and simultaneous ecological degradation. Concurrently, the need for conservation to respect inherent human rights, including the rights and title of Indigenous Peoples, is increasingly recognized. Here, we describe the often overlooked role that resurgent Indigenous-led governance could have in driving rapid, socially just increases in conservation. Whereas Indigenous resurgence spans all aspects of governance, we focus on three aspects that highlight both the necessity and nascent potential of supporting resurgent Indigenous-led governance systems as they relate to conservation of lands and seas. Firstly, much of the landscapes and seascapes of conservation interest are within Indigenous territories, so augmenting conservation within them will increasingly not be possible, justified, nor legal without Indigenous consent and partnership. Secondly, resurgent Indigenous governance provides potential for rapidly increasing the spatial coverage of conserved areas. Thirdly, resurgent Indigenous governance provides potential for increased conservation effectiveness. We focus on Canada, a country disproportionately composed of globally significant intact ecosystems and other ecosystems with considerable ecological value, comprised of Indigenous territories, and where Indigenous governments are well-positioned to advance meaningful conservation at a large scale. We discuss broader implications, with Indigenous territories covering large swaths of the globe, including in all five countries (Canada, USA, Australia, Brazil, Russia) whose borders contain the majority of the world's remaining intact landscapes. We offer suggestions for supporting resurgent Indigenous governance to achieve biodiversity conservation that is effective and socially just.

Highlights

  • In an effort to address international biodiversity declines and concurrent ecological degradation, Parties of The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) agreed in 2010 to a Strategic Plan for Biodiversity (2011–2020), including the 20 ‘Aichi Biodiversity Targets’

  • They harmonized their plans, creating the Central Coast First Nations Marine Use Plan, which, if implemented with the recommended levels of protection, would achieve many of the best practices identified in the literature and would substantially outperform the existing federal Marine Protected Areas (MPA) network (Ban et al, 2014), parts of which have been criticized for providing limited protections (Lemieux et al, 2019)

  • All of these developments are ongoing and with uncertain outcomes, many of which could potentially be altered based on political changes or other external factors, these developments all point to an increased understanding of the need for supporting Indigenous-led initiatives, providing optimism for similar advancements in the future

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Addressing ongoing biodiversity declines post-2020 will require substantial increases in the pace, scale, and effectiveness of conservation, suggesting a need for rethinking approaches to conservation governance (Ceballos and Ehrlich, 2006; Dinerstein et al, 2017; Garnett et al, 2018; Jonas et al, 2014; Maron et al, 2018; Noss et al, 2012). Supporting resurgent Indigenous-led governance of lands and seas for advancing conservation that is socially just and effective. We highlight the concurrent potential benefits for ecological stewardship and conservation We discuss both the direct protections of lands and seas, in line with what might be currently categorized in Industrial societies as ‘conservation’, as well as other aspects of land and sea stewardship, for example, of harvested resources and placebased agricultural practices. We focus on Canada, a country of global conservation significance given its disproportionate representation of the world’s remaining intact ecosystems (Ellis and Ramankutty, 2008; Watson et al, 2018b) and its globally significant provision of ecosystem services (Andrew et al, 2014; Anielski and Wilson, 2005), and discuss how insights from here are applicable globally

Conservation increasingly likely to fail without Indigenous consent
Opportunities for supporting resurgent Indigenous governance
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.