Abstract

The goal of this manuscript was to study the immobilization of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and hematin on different supports at selected conditions to be used in the removal of two synthetic dyes: Alizarin Red (AR) and Eriochrome Blue Black R (EBBR). Reuse in the target reactions was tested for the best biocatalysts. Three supports were selected: magnetite-activated carbon Fe3O4/C, activated carbon C and chitosan CS. Several reasons led to discard the use of Fe3O4/C and C as supports for hematin and HRP. CS–glutaraldehyde (GA)–HRP not only has low ability to remove EBBR, but also the enzymatic activity of HRP could not be separated from the dye adsorption on CS. However, some adsorptive functions of CS–GA were lost when HRP was supported on it.In the case of CS–GA–hematin, the most important factors for EBBR removal are dye concentration and mass of catalyst, whereas the temperature has almost no effect on the conversion of dye, considering in all cases the H2O2 concentration (0.021M) constant.There was not a marked decrease in the removal of AR even after the ninth reuse in the case of CS–GA–hematin. For EBBR removal, with CS–GA–HRP, in the second reuse the catalyst was completely deactivated, whereas with CS–GA–hematin this was found only in the fourth reuse.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.