Abstract

PurposeTraditionally, clinical evaluation of motor paralysis following stroke has been of value to physicians and therapists because it allows for immediate pathophysiological assessment without the need for specialized tools. However, current clinical methods do not provide objective quantification of movement; therefore, they are of limited use to physicians and therapists when assessing responses to rehabilitation. The present study aimed to create a support vector machine (SVM)-based classifier to analyze and validate finger kinematics using the leap motion controller. Results were compared with those of 24 stroke patients assessed by therapists.MethodsA non-linear SVM was used to classify data according to the Brunnstrom recovery stages of finger movements by focusing on peak angle and peak velocity patterns during finger flexion and extension. One thousand bootstrap data values were generated by randomly drawing a series of sample data from the actual normalized kinematics-related data. Bootstrap data values were randomly classified into training (940) and testing (60) datasets. After establishing an SVM classification model by training with the normalized kinematics-related parameters of peak angle and peak velocity, the testing dataset was assigned to predict classification of paralytic movements.ResultsHigh separation accuracy was obtained (mean 0.863; 95% confidence interval 0.857–0.869; p = 0.006).ConclusionThis study highlights the ability of artificial intelligence to assist physicians and therapists evaluating hand movement recovery of stroke patients.

Highlights

  • The most common paresis to occur following stroke is contralateral hemiplegia with involvement of upper extremities and fingers [1]

  • The present study investigated the utility of artificial intelligence for assessing recovery of hand dysfunction following stroke through the analysis of finger kinematics obtained with Leap Motion Controller (LMC) by using a support vector machine (SVM)

  • The peak velocities of finger flexion increased with the Brunnstrom Recovery Stages (BRSs) stage, whereas the peak velocities of finger extension did not correlate with the BRS stage (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients; finger flexion, r = 0.776, p = 0.0002; finger extension, r = 0.285, p = 0.267) (Fig. 5c, d)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most common paresis to occur following stroke is contralateral hemiplegia with involvement of upper extremities and fingers [1]. One drawback of most traditionally used clinical assessment methods is that while they report whether a person can implement a task or not (for example, lift and move a small object), they fail to quantify the process of the activity, amount of compensatory movements from other joints, time to peak velocity, or sequence of joint involvement. Measurement of these parameters may provide better insight into the underlying mechanisms of movement disorders [3, 4]. The present study investigated the utility of artificial intelligence for assessing recovery of hand dysfunction following stroke through the analysis of finger kinematics obtained with LMC by using a support vector machine (SVM)

Participants
Ethical Considerations
Digital Measurements
Brunnstrom Recovery Stages
Procedures
Therapist Assessment of Finger Movement Capability
Data Analysis
Results
Discussion and Conclusions
E Flexion in BRS ϭ
B Peak angle of extension
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call