Abstract

BackgroundGene order in eukaryotic genomes is not random, with genes with similar expression profiles tending to cluster. In yeasts, the model taxon for gene order analysis, such syntenic clusters of non-homologous genes tend to be conserved over evolutionary time. Whether similar clusters show gene order conservation in other lineages is, however, undecided. Here, we examine this issue in Drosophila melanogaster using high-resolution chromosome rearrangement data.ResultsWe show that D. melanogaster has at least three classes of expression clusters: first, as observed in mammals, large clusters of functionally unrelated housekeeping genes; second, small clusters of functionally related highly co-expressed genes; and finally, as previously defined by Spellman and Rubin, larger domains of co-expressed but functionally unrelated genes. The latter are, however, not independent of the small co-expression clusters and likely reflect a methodological artifact. While the small co-expression and housekeeping/essential gene clusters resemble those observed in yeast, in contrast to yeast, we see no evidence that any of the three cluster types are preserved as synteny blocks. If anything, adjacent co-expressed genes are more likely to become rearranged than expected. Again in contrast to yeast, in D. melanogaster, gene pairs with short intergene distance or in divergent orientations tend to have higher rearrangement rates. These findings are consistent with co-expression being partly due to shared chromatin environment.ConclusionsWe conclude that, while similar in terms of cluster types, gene order evolution has strikingly different patterns in yeasts and in D. melanogaster, although recombination is associated with gene order rearrangement in both.

Highlights

  • Gene order in eukaryotic genomes is not random, with genes with similar expression profiles tending to cluster

  • In addition to the functional similarities observed in small co-expression clusters [6], both essential gene clusters and co-expression clusters show a tendency to be preserved as syntenic units over evolutionary time [8,9,10,11]

  • Characterizing housekeeping clusters D. melanogaster has clusters of housekeeping genes We previously found that adjacent genes in D. melanogaster are more similar in terms of their tissue specificities than randomly selected genes [28]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gene order in eukaryotic genomes is not random, with genes with similar expression profiles tending to cluster. The model taxon for gene order analysis, such syntenic clusters of non-homologous genes tend to be conserved over evolutionary time. In all well studied eukaryotic genomes gene order is known not to be random, with genes with similar expression profiles tending to cluster (see, for example, [1,2,3,4]). In addition to the functional similarities observed in small co-expression clusters [6], both essential gene clusters and co-expression clusters show a tendency to be preserved as syntenic units over evolutionary time [8,9,10,11]. While genes that are in close proximity are less likely to be rearranged, the above conservation of synteny cannot be accounted for by intergene distance (IGD) alone [9,11]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.