Abstract
The use of health insurance to cover legal abortion is a controversial issue on which Americans are sharply divided. Currently, there is a lack of research on this issue as data became available only recently. Using data from the newly released General Social Survey in 2018, this study examines who is more or less likely to support health insurance coverage for legal abortion. The results show that the support and opposition were about evenly divided. The findings from the logistic regression analysis reveal that, holding other variables constant, Democrats, liberals, urban residents, the more educated, and the older were more likely to support health insurance coverage for legal abortion while women, Southerners, Christians, the currently married, and those with more children were less likely to favor it, compared to their respective counterparts. Additionally, the effect of education was stronger for liberals than for non-liberals. Race, family income, and full-time work status make no difference in the outcome. The findings have significant implications for research and practices in health insurance coverage for legal abortion.
Highlights
The debate about restriction to legal abortion access is again taking a center stage in the United States
We focus on the research question of who is more or less likely to support using health insurance for legal abortion
We address this question using the latest data from General Social Survey (GSS) collected in
Summary
The debate about restriction to legal abortion access is again taking a center stage in the United States. Germane to this debate, whether it is apropos to use health insurance to cover legal abortion is a controversial issue facing American society today. Most research tends to focus on the policy of abortion, moral rights, and the mental health of women receiving an abortion, but not much about health insurance coverage for an abortion [1,3,4,5]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International journal of environmental research and public health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.