Abstract

This brief discusses the impact of twin- and triple-well structures on power supply noise, and a substrate model for simulating the power supply noise. We observed <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">V</i> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ss</sub> noise reduction by the resistive network of the p-substrate and <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">V</i> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">dd</sub> noise reduction by the junction capacitance of a triple-well structure on a 90-nm test chip. Measurement results also showed that the total noise reduction of a triple-well structure is superior to that of a twin-well structure. The measurement results correlate well with the results obtained from the power supply noise simulation using a hierarchical resistive mesh model. Our simulation-based verification indicates that in common CMOS design, a triple-well structure can reduce the power supply drop by 10%-40% or the decoupling capacitance area by 5%-10%. We also verified that supply drop sensitivity to variation of the well junction capacitance is sufficiently small and that supply noise reduction using a triple-well structure is robust to process variation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.