Abstract

In the direct aftermath of supply disruptions, managers typically face uncertainty in the form of incomplete or unreliable information about the consequences of possible response actions. To gain a better understanding of how to recover from disruptions and support effective disruption management, this study proposes an agent-based simulation model of supply disruption responses and organizational recovery processes. Based on this model, we analyze the performance outcomes of a decision-maker's tendency to reduce uncertainty by collecting further information before taking action (ready-aim-fire) or to act immediately (ready-fire-aim) under different conditions. The findings suggest that quick reactions can be beneficial, even if the exact consequences of response actions cannot precisely be predicted. Furthermore, in complex environments, ready-fire-aim leads to a better average performance than ready-aim-fire, if response uncertainty is not very high. However, ready-fire-aim requires more alterations to ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call