Abstract
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become the focus of the company’s daily operations and strategic choices. At present, the supply risk events caused by the CSR violations of service providers in the service supply chain are frequent, which highlight the importance of formulating appropriate contracts to constrain the CSR level of providers. In the context of asymmetric CSR cost information, this paper analyzes the optimal contract parameters of integrators when providing screening contracts or pooling contracts and compares their impact on profits and the CSR level. The information asymmetry belongs to classic principal-agent problem, and we will use the revelation principle to design the contracts and solve this problem. The results that different contracts have different effects on the CSR level of different types of providers. A low-cost provider’s CSR level is the highest when a screening contract is provided, while a high-cost provider’s CSR level reaches the peak under a pooling contract. If pursuing profit maximization, the integrator should choose to provide a screening contract. When the integrator needs to ensure a higher average level of social responsibility, a pooling contract should be chosen. The findings also show that service cost is an important factor affecting the CSR level of the provider, and only when the providers’ service cost is low, will providers actively fulfill their social responsibility.
Highlights
Nowadays, sustainable supply chain management is highly valued by practitioners and researchers
(3) How do integrators choose the right contract based on the needs of the company? And, under information asymmetry, what is the information rent that the integrator needs to pay under the two contracts?
Insights This paper considers a two-stage service supply chain consisting of an integrator and a provider and studies the optimal contract parameters of the integrator under the three following models: 6. Conclusion and Management Insights
Summary
Sustainable supply chain management is highly valued by practitioners and researchers. In May 2018, STO Express, one of the biggest express companies in China, was faced with scrutiny because its sorting service provider in Xizhimen, Beijing was accused of “violent sorting” and many parcels were broken. This scandal brought severe negative impacts to STO Express and greatly damaged the corporate image of STO Express among customers [4]. Airbnb was faced a lawsuit in U.S court due to a family was killed in the homeowners’ house [6] These cases all show that when the suppliers fail to abide by socially responsible behavior, it will bring large losses to the companies
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.