Abstract
Abstract When procuring from a manufacturer (she) with random yield, the retailer (he) is often reluctant to share the risk caused by this yield, while the manufacturer is not. However, if the manufacturer possesses private productivity information, the retailer may change his decision. To capture the interaction between risk-sharing and asymmetric information, we build a model in which the retailer designs a non-risk-sharing contract (a simple wholesale price contract) or a risk-sharing contract (a wholesale price contract with a subsidy) for the manufacturer given both random yield and private productivity information. The manufacturer’s best response, the optimal contract menus and the supply chain participants’ profits in each case are theoretically derived. By examining the value of risk-sharing, we find that the retailer cannot benefit from risk-sharing under symmetric information. Interestingly, under asymmetric information, risk-sharing benefits not only the manufacturer but also the retailer under certain conditions, resulting in a win-win situation for both the retailer and the manufacturer. Furthermore, we analyze the value of information, illustrating that asymmetric information always harms the retailer and benefits the manufacturer regardless of whether or not the retailer shares risk. However, risk-sharing can weaken (enhance) the effect of asymmetric information on the retailer (manufacturer). Additionally, we derive the optimal contract menus under deterministic yield and find that risk-sharing makes no significance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.