Abstract
This paper investigates the influence of supplier’s asset structure in financing strategies on an extended supply chain with one retailer, one capital-constraint supplier, and one bank, where the retailer acts as a leader. Three financing strategies are considered: bank financing (BF), a guaranteed contract with a buy-back clause (GBB), and a guaranteed contract with a wholesale price discount clause (GWD). We find that if the supplier has an adequate asset structure, the supplier can increase profits for both sides of the supply chain. We obtain interest rates under BF and a guaranteed contract. Furthermore, the choice of the contract is related to the market environment, and we find the threshold for contract selection. Through a comparison, we show that a GWD contract is a better financing strategy under exuberant market demand. Finally, we provide concrete numerical examples to verify the impact of the supplier’s asset structure and contract parameters on the profits and financing model selection of both parties in the supply chain.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.