Abstract

Supply Chain Class Consciousness: Lukács, Crisis, and the Immanent Standpoint of LogisticsStefan YongStefan YongMailstop- HISC, UC Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:April 2023https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2023.87.2.228PDFPDF PLUS ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations AboutReferencesBernes Jasper. 2013. “Logistics, Counterlogistics and the Communist Prospect.” Endnotes, 3. Google ScholarBernes Jasper. 2018. “The Belly of the Revolution: Agriculture, Energy, and the Future of Communism.” Pp. 331–375 in Materialism and the Critique of Energy, edited by Bellamy Brent Ryan, and Diamanti Jeff. Chicago: MCM Publishing. Google ScholarBernes Jasper. 2020. “Planning and Anarchy.” South Atlantic Quarterly, 119:1, 53–73. Crossref, Google ScholarBonacich Edna and Wilson Jake B.. 2008. Getting the Goods: Ports, Labor, and the Logistics Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google ScholarBrenner Robert. 2006. The Economics of Global Turbulence: The Advanced Capitalist Economies from Long Boom to Long Downturn, 1945-2005. London and New York: Verso. Google ScholarCowen Deborah. 2014. The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Crossref, Google ScholarGilbert Andrew Simon. 2019. The Crisis Paradigm: Description and Prescription in Social and Political Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Crossref, Google ScholarJameson Fredric. 2009. “Utopia as Replication.” Pp. 410–434 in Valences of the Dialectic. London and New York: Verso. Google ScholarKumar Ashok. 2020. Monopsony Capitalism: Power and Production in the Twilight of the Sweatshop Age. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarLarsen Neil. 2011. “Lukács sans Proletariat, or Can History and Class Consciousness Be Rehistoricized?” Pp. 81–100 in Georg Lukács: The Fundamental Dissonance of Existence, edited by Bewes Timothy, and Hall Timothy. London and New York: Continuum. Google ScholarLopez Daniel Andrés. 2020. Lukács: Praxis and the Absolute. Chicago: Haymarket Books. Crossref, Google ScholarLukács Georg. 1966. “Technology and Social Relations.” New Left Review, 39, 27–34. Google ScholarLukács Georg. 1971. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Trans. Livingstone Rodney. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google ScholarMarx Karl. 1981. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 3. Trans. Fernbach David. London: Penguin Classics. Google ScholarMattick Paul. 2011. Business as Usual: The Economic Crisis and the Failure of Capitalism. London: Reaktion Books. Google ScholarPetrovic Misha and Hamilton Gary G.. 2006. “Making Global Markets: Wal-Mart and Its Suppliers.” Pp. 107–142 in Wal-Mart: The Face of Twenty-First Century Capitalism, edited by Lichtenstein Nelson. New York: The New Press. Google ScholarPostone Moishe. 1993. Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google ScholarSmith John. 2016. Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century: Globalization, Super-Exploitation, and Capitalism's Final Crisis. New York: Monthly Review Press. Google ScholarToscano Alberto. 2011. “Logistics and Opposition.” Mute, 3:2. https://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/logistics-and-opposition Google ScholarToscano Alberto. 2014. “Lineaments of the Logistical State.” Viewpoint, 4. https://viewpointmag.com/2014/09/28/lineaments-of-the-logistical-state/ Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 87Issue 2Apr 2023 Information© 2023 by S & S Quarterly, Inc.PDF download

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.