Supplementary files

Abstract

Fig. S1. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum likelihood analysis of the LSU gene region. The dataset consisted of 233 isolates and 859 characters before and after Gblocks treatment. Bootstrap values above 60 % are shown. Purple blocks indicate existing genera, yellow blocks new genera described in this study, green blocks genera that we redefine here, and blue blocks indicate genera that we here re-instate and re-define. <br />Fig. S2. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum likelihood analysis of the ITS gene region. The dataset consisted of 235 isolates and 169 characters after Gblocks treatment (1 171 characters prior to Gblocks, including gaps). ML values above 60 % are shown. Purple blocks indicate existing genera, yellow blocks new genera described in this study, green blocks genera that we redefine here, and blue blocks indicate genera that we here re-instate and re-define.<br />Fig. S3. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum likelihood analysis of the TEF1-α gene region. The dataset consisted of 207 isolates and 380 characters after Gblocks treatment (655 characters prior to Gblocks, including gaps). ML values above 60 % are shown. Purple blocks indicate existing genera, yellow blocks new genera described in this study, green blocks genera that we redefine here, and blue blocks indicate genera that we here re-instate and re-define.<br />Fig. S4. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum likelihood analysis of the RPBII gene region. The dataset consisted of 171 isolates and 952 characters after Gblocks treatment (1 108 characters prior to Gblocks, including gaps). ML values above 60 % are shown. Purple blocks indicate existing genera, yellow blocks new genera described in this study, green blocks genera that we redefine here, and blue blocks indicate genera that we here re-instate and re-define.<br />Table S1. Taxa included in the phylogenomic analyses and their genome sequence statistics