Abstract

Supplementary feeding of wild birds by domestic garden-holders is a globally widespread and popular form of human–wildlife interaction, particularly in urban areas. Vast amounts of energy are thus being added to garden ecosystems. However, the potential indirect effects of this activity on non-avian species have been little studied to date, with the only two previous studies taking place under experimentally manipulated conditions. Here we present the first evidence of a localised depletive effect of wild bird feeding on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in suburban gardens under the usual feeding patterns of the garden-holders. We trapped significantly fewer ground beetles directly under bird-feeding stations than in matched areas of habitat away from feeders. Video analysis also revealed significantly higher activity by ground-foraging birds under the feeding stations than in the control areas. Small mammal trapping revealed no evidence that these species differ in abundance between gardens with and without bird feeders. We therefore suggest that local increases in ground-foraging activity by bird species whose diets encompass arthropods as well as seed material are responsible for the reduction in ground beetle numbers. Our work therefore illustrates that providing food for wild birds can have indirect negative effects on palatable prey species under typical conditions.

Highlights

  • Providing food for wild birds in domestic gardens is a popular activity across many parts of the world

  • The number of species observed in the feeder areas was significantly higher than in the control areas (P=0.036; Wilcoxon statistic= 21.0; median difference=5.00; Q1–Q3=4.75–6.75)

  • In contrast to our predictions, we found no evidence of a difference in abundance of small mammals between gardens that provided wild bird food and those that

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Providing food for wild birds in domestic gardens is a popular activity across many parts of the world. In the UK, estimates of participation from large-scale, relatively unbiased data sets are 56 % of English households (ODPM 2003) and 48 % of UK ones (Davies et al 2009). Similar household estimates exist for Australia (36–48 %; Ishigame and Baxter 2007) and the USA (47 %; calculated from US Fish and Wildlife Service 2006, and US Census Bureau 2011). Alternative indicators are the US$3.4 billion spent by US residents on wild bird food in 2006.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call