Abstract

AbstractChapatis and parathas were made from different combinations of durum (Triticum durum Desf) and aestivum (Triticum aestivum L) wheat to test for their organoleptic acceptability. The best accepted durum/aestivum (40:60) combination was supplemented at 10, 20, 30 and 40% levels with Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum L) flour and soya protein (Glycine max L) concentrate. Raw and cooked samples were analysed for some amino acids and trypsin inhibitor activity. The most acceptable cooked products were fed to growing rats for estimation of protein efficiency ratio, apparent digestibility and plasma proteins. Cooking resulted in considerable losses in cystine, available lysine and trypsin inhibitor activity. The losses were greater in paratha than in chapati. Protein efficiency ratio and apparent N digestibility of chapatis were significantly higher than those of parathas. However, protein quality of soya‐supplemented parathas was better than that of chapatis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.