Abstract
<p>Supplemental Material and Methods, Tables S1-S6, Figure S1 Supplemental Table S1. Hazard Ratiosa and 95% CIs from analyses of nutrient and food intakes (FDR≤0.10) reported in the baseline dietary assessment in relation to endometrial cancer risk in the EPIC study. Supplemental Table S2. Hazard Ratiosa and 95% CIs from analyses of intake of nutrients/foods at baseline (FDR > 0.10) in relation to endometrial cancer risk in the EPIC study. Supplemental Table S3. Age-standardized dietary intake of selected foods/nutrients (FDR≤0.10 in the EPIC studya) at the study baseline in the EPIC, NHS and NHSII study populations. Supplemental Table S4. Hazard Ratiosa and 95% CIs from analyses of intake of selected nutrients/foods at baseline in relation to endometrial cancer risk in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and NHSII. Supplemental Table S5. Hazard Ratiosa and 95% CIs from analyses of the cumulative average intake of selected nutrients/foods in relation to endometrial cancer risk in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and NHSII. Supplemental Table S6. Hazard Ratiosa and 95% CIs from analyses of the cumulative average intake of selected nutrients/foods in relation to invasive endometrial adenocarcinoma risk in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and NHSII. Supplemental Figure S1. Summary of NWAS analytical method to test associations between food and nutrient intake and risk of endometrial cancer (EC.</p>
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
