Supervision in Occupational Therapy, Part 2: The Supervisee's Dilemma

Abstract

The first paper (Sweeney et al 2001) in this series of three on supervision in occupational therapy reported the views and experiences of occupational therapy supervisors. In contrast to the supervisor experience, where there remains a paucity of evidence in the general literature, the clinician as supervisee has been relatively well explored. However, the literature on the experiences of the occupational therapy supervisee is virtually nonexistent. This paper, the second in the series, describes a grounded theory study which set out to explore the process of first-line supervision from the perspective of the novice occupational therapy supervisee (those employed at basic grade and senior II levels). Data collection took the form of semi-structured, one-to-one interviews with 30 female supervisees, who were drawn from a wide range of clinical specialties within the National Health Service in the South West of England. The findings suggested that there existed a large gap between what many of the supervisees expected from supervision and what they actually received. In addition, there was evidence that the typical supervisee entered the supervision process with the aim of presenting a professional face to her supervisor and to the wider health care team and that she did this to protect her fragile sense of competence. Many supervisees employed a range of covert strategies within the supervision setting in order to facilitate the presentation of a professional face. The use of this approach carried with it a number of risks and benefits for the supervisee. The final paper in the series will discuss the implications of these two studies of supervisor and supervisee experience in order to distil recommendations for the future practice of supervision within the profession.