Abstract

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a promising technique for in-service inspection of technical structures in a broad field of applications in order to reduce maintenance efforts as well as the overall structural weight. SHM is basically an inverse problem deriving physical properties such as damages or material inhomogeneity (target features) from sensor data. Often models defining the relationship between predictable features and sensors are required but not available. The main objective of this work is the investigation of model-free distributed machine learning (DML) for damage diagnostics under resource and failure constraints by using multi-instance ensemble and model fusion strategies and featuring improved scaling and stability compared with centralised single-instance approaches. The diagnostic system delivers two features: A binary damage classification (damaged or non-damaged) and an estimation of the spatial damage position in case of a damaged structure. The proposed damage diagnostics architecture should be able to be used in low-resource sensor networks with soft real-time capabilities. Two different machine learning methodologies and architectures are evaluated and compared posing low- and high-resolution sensor processing for low- and high-resolution damage diagnostics, i.e., a dedicated supervised trained low-resource and an unsupervised trained high-resource deep learning approach, respectively. In both architectures state-based recurrent artificial neural networks are used that process spatially and time-resolved sensor data from experimental ultrasonic guided wave measurements of a hybrid material (carbon fibre laminate) plate with pseudo defects. Finally, both architectures can be fused to a hybrid architecture with improved damage detection accuracy and reliability. An extensive evaluation of the damage prediction by both systems shows high reliability and accuracy of damage detection and localisation, even by the distributed multi-instance architecture with a resolution in the order of the sensor distance.

Highlights

  • Introduction and Related WorkStructural health monitoring (SHM) based on Lamb waves, a type of ultrasonic guided waves, is a promising technique for in-service inspection of aircraft structures

  • Damage diagnostics can be an inherently distributed problem [4] using spatially distributed sensors [5] still processed by a central instance leading to scaling and efficiency issues

  • Common to both approaches is the deployment of state-based recurrent artificial neural networks (ANN) (RNN) processing time-resolved sensor signal data from a spatially bounded context

Read more

Summary

Introduction and Related Work

Structural health monitoring (SHM) based on Lamb waves, a type of ultrasonic guided waves, is a promising technique for in-service inspection of aircraft structures. One major challenge is training of the predictor functions with limited variance of training data, concerning the variance of experiments of a single set-up to cover typical measuring and specimen variations (i.e., repetitions of experiments under same conditions with the same parameter set for the device under test, damage, and the measuring set-up) and the variance of experiments and the respective features (i.e., different damage cases, classes, positions, sensors, environmental conditions) This limited training data results commonly in a lack of required generalisation of the prediction model that cannot be transferred to a broader range of parameter sets and unknown specimen configurations. Two different approaches are compared in this work, which are fused to a hybrid system: A multi-instance low-resolution and a single-instance high-resolution architecture differing in resource requirements and the training class (supervised versa unsupervised learning, respectively) Common to both approaches is the deployment of state-based recurrent ANN (RNN) processing time-resolved sensor signal data from a spatially bounded context (i.e., local sensor data processing). Both approaches are compared and fused to a hybrid architecture (more as an outlook)

Feature Selection and Extraction
Taxonomy of Architectures
Generalization
Sensor Processing
Computational Complexity and Resources
Experimental Data Sets of Lamb Wave Propagation Fields
Signal Features and Damage-Wave Interaction
Feature Selection and Network Architecture
Training
Feature Selection and Training
Network Architecture
Post Processing
Results
Hybrid Architecture
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call