Abstract

The Fermilab Muon g− 2 collaboration recently announced the first result of measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment (g− 2), which confirmed the previous result at the Brookhaven National Laboratory and thus the discrepancy with its Standard Model prediction. We revisit low-scale supersymmetric models that are naturally capable to solve the muon g− 2 anomaly, focusing on two distinct scenarios: chargino-contribution dominated and pure-bino-contribution dominated scenarios. It is shown that the slepton pair-production searches have excluded broad parameter spaces for both two scenarios, but they are not closed yet. For the chargino-dominated scenario, the models with {m}_{{tilde{mu}}_{mathrm{L}}}gtrsim {m}_{{tilde{chi}}_1^{pm }} are still widely allowed. For the bino-dominated scenario, we find that, although slightly non-trivial, the region with low tan β with heavy higgsinos is preferred. In the case of universal slepton masses, the low mass regions with {m}_{tilde{mu}} ≲ 230 GeV can explain the g− 2 anomaly while satisfying the LHC constraints. Furthermore, we checked that the stau-bino coannihilation works properly to realize the bino thermal relic dark matter. We also investigate heavy staus case for the bino-dominated scenario, where the parameter region that can explain the muon g− 2 anomaly is stretched to {m}_{tilde{mu}} ≲ 1.3 TeV.

Highlights

  • The Fermilab Muon g − 2 collaboration recently announced the first result of measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment (g − 2), which confirmed the previous result at the Brookhaven National Laboratory and the discrepancy with its Standard Model prediction

  • The SUSY contribution to the muon g − 2 cannot be arbitrarily large because μ tan β is bounded from above; due to the stau left-right mixing, a too large μ tan β can violate one of the following constraints, (i) the vacuum stability in the stau-Higgs potential, eq (3.6), (ii) the neutralino being the lightest SUSY particle (LSP), i.e., mτ1 > mχ01, and (iii) the LEP bound on the stau mass, mτ1 > 95.7 GeV

  • The first result of the measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment (g − 2) by the Fermilab Muon g − 2 collaboration confirmed the previous result at the Brookhaven National Laboratory and the long-standing discrepancy with the Standard Model prediction

Read more

Summary

Chargino contributions

We consider the parameter regions where the chargino contribution to the muon g − 2 is dominant, based on our previous study [48]. SLSL/C SLSL/A (B) μ = 2M2, M1 = M2/2. NC/3L SLSL/C SLSL/A (C) μ = M2, mχ01 = 100 GeV. . The gray-filled to a compressed region, where the LSP is ν, spectrum, are not studied. The red-hatched region in The red-filled and blue-filled (A), which regions are excluded by the LHC experiment [50, 52, 53]. Detailed description of the LHC constraints is provided in our previous work [48]

Setup and result
LHC constraints
Bino contributions
Constraints
Result in universal slepton mass case
GeV is
Conclusions and discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.