Abstract

The gauged $U(1)_{L_{\mu}-L_{\tau}}$ model can provide for additional contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment by means of a loop involving the $Z^{\prime}$ gauge boson. However, the parameter space of such models is severely constrained if one combines the latest muon $(g-2)$ data with various neutrino experiments, such as neutrino trident production, $\nu -e$ and $\nu -q$ elastic scattering, etc. In a supersymmetric $U(1)_{L_{\mu}-L_{\tau}}$ model, a larger region of parameter space opens up, thus enabling one to explore otherwise forbidden regions of parameter space in nonsupersymmetric models involving the new gauge coupling ($g_X$) and the mass of the $Z^\prime$ gauge boson ($M_{Z^{\prime}}$) . We show that the minimal model with the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) field content is strongly disfavored from $Z$-boson decay and neutrino data. We also show that the nonminimal model with two extra singlet superfields can lead to correct neutrino masses and mixing involving both tree-level and one-loop contributions. We find that, in this model, both muon $(g-2)$ and neutrino data may be simultaneously explained in a parameter region consistent with experimental observations. In addition, we observe that the muon $(g-2)$ anomaly can be accommodated even with higher values of electroweak sparticle masses compared to the MSSM. Charged lepton-flavor-violating processes (like $\mu\rightarrow e\gamma$, $\tau\rightarrow \mu\gamma$, etc.) may have potentially large branching ratios in this scenario. Depending on the magnitude of the supersymmetry contribution to these processes, they may constrain hitherto unconstrained regions of the $M_{Z^{\prime}}-g_X$ parameter space. However, we find that these branching fractions never exceed their upper bounds in a region where both muon $(g-2)$ and neutrino oscillation data can be simultaneously accommodated.

Highlights

  • The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics is a successful theory

  • We show that the minimal model with the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) field content is strongly disfavored from Z-boson decay and neutrino data

  • We find that the Z0 contribution and the SUSY contribution complement each other so that we can have heavier sparticle masses than we could in the MSSM while still explaining ðg − 2Þμ

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics is a successful theory. it does not seem to be a complete one: it cannot explain either the neutrino masses and mixing pattern or the 3.6σ discrepancy between the SM prediction of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon and its experimental value [1,2,3,4]. In order to explain the neutrino mass pattern and mixing [5] and the muon anomalous magnetic moment, among other issues, one needs to look for physics beyond the SM. Neutrino masses and mixing were studied in a Uð1ÞLμ−Lτ symmetric model with additional scalars and vector-like leptons in Ref. The allowed parameter space in this scenario, which is otherwise forbidden in non-SUSY models, can be probed using various pertinent observables like neutrino masses and mixing, dark matter, several B-decay anomalies, and signatures at the LHC. In a supersymmetric gauged Uð1ÞLμ−Lτ model it is possible to have much higher neutralino and slepton masses while still explaining muon (g − 2), in contrast with the MSSM as discussed above. Analytical expressions for the scalar mass matrices, the chargino mass matrix and the amplitudes for charged lepton-flavorviolating processes in the nonminimal model are included in the Appendices

THE MINIMAL MODEL
Scalar sector
Lμ g2x 8
Scalar mass matrices
Lκ þ v2κ þ
Failure of the minimal model
THE NONMINIMAL MODEL
Free from gauge anomalies
Vacua and scalar masses
Minimization of the potential
NEUTRALINO AND NEUTRINO MASSES IN THE NONMINIMAL MODEL
M2Z0 c2γ g22d1 tξ M2W c2β Mgd2 M2Z0 cγ sγ þM0μη g22d1
Mass models and possible mixing patterns
Numerical analysis
ANOMALOUS MAGNETIC MOMENT
Outline of the calculation
Neutralino–charged scalar loop
Chargino–neutral scalar loop
Z0 contribution
CONCLUSION
CP-even mass-squared matrix
B B cot β 2μ22tξ
Charged scalar mass-squared matrix
The neutralino–charged scalar amplitude
Findings
M2Z0 þ hzðxzA0
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call