Abstract

We examined reactivity of H(2) on Ru(0001) using molecular beam techniques and we compared our results to experimental results for similar systems. The dissociative adsorption of H(2) on Ru(0001) is similar to that on Pt(111) and Ni(111), although on ruthenium nonactivated adsorption is strongly suggested. However, we find no clear signature of a steering- or precursor-based mechanism that favors nonactivated reaction paths at low kinetic energy. In comparison to Pd(111) and Rh(111) our results indicate that a universal mechanism enhancing reactivity at low energy does not have a mass dependence. In addition, we have compared our results to predictions of reactivity for H(2) on Ru(0001) from six-dimensional dynamical calculations using two different generalized gradient approximation functionals. It leads us to conclude that the PW91 functional yields a more accurate value for the minimum energy path but does not impose enough corrugation in the potential. The revised-Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (RPBE) functional appears to behave slightly better at higher energies, but we find significant quantitative disagreement. We show that the difference is not due to different energy resolutions between experiment and theory. However, it may be due to a dependence of the reactivity on rotational state or on omission of relevant dimensions in the theoretical description.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.