Abstract
AbstractRupture velocity is a fundamental feature of earthquake behavior. How rupture velocity is defined can therefore affect our understanding of earthquake physics. Based on dynamic rupture simulations, we compare the tangent and average rupture velocities calculated via one‐ and two‐dimensional gradients. Two strike‐slip scenarios with free‐surface‐induced supershear ruptures are presented within a homogeneous and a depth‐dependent stress regime, respectively. Although both scenarios produce a daughter crack that propagate over the seismogenic depth, in the depth‐dependent case the 1D and 2D rupture velocities capture different features: A 1D horizontal gradient measurement implies a supershear rupture, while a 2D gradient measurement reveals sub‐Rayleigh rupture propagation everywhere except very close to the free surface. A large area on the fault with the 1D horizontal tangent rupture velocity does not necessarily produce an observable Mach front, which arises the importance of rupture velocity definitions in supershear analysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.