Abstract

We consider black hole - galaxy coevolution using simple analytic arguments. We focus on the fact that several supermassive black holes are known with masses significantly larger than suggested by the $M - {\sigma}$ relation, sometimes also with rather small stellar masses. We show that these are likely to have descended from extremely compact `blue nugget' galaxies born at high redshift, whose very high velocity dispersions allowed the black holes to reach unusually large masses. Subsequent interactions reduce the velocity dispersion, so the black holes lie above the usual $M - {\sigma}$ relation and expel a large fraction of the bulge gas (as in WISE J104222.11+164115.3) that would otherwise make stars, before ending at low redshift as very massive holes in galaxies with relatively low stellar masses, such as NGC 4889 and NGC 1600. We further suggest the possible existence of two new types of galaxy: low-mass dwarfs whose central black holes lie below the $M - {\sigma}$ relation at low redshift, and galaxies consisting of very massive ($\gtrsim 10^{11}$M$_{\odot}$) black holes with extremely small stellar masses. This second group would be very difficult to detect electromagnetically, but potentially offer targets of considerable interest for LISA.

Highlights

  • The realisation that observations imply scaling relations between supermassive black holes (SMBH) and their host galaxies has stimulated significant efforts to identify the underlying physics

  • The fact that the binding energy of the SMBH always far exceeds that of the host galaxy bulge strongly suggests black hole feedback as the basic cause

  • This generally halts significant further SMBH growth, which can only resume if events such as mergers or dissipation rebuild the bulge gas and restart evolution towards the Equation 1 with larger M and σ

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The realisation that observations imply scaling relations between supermassive black holes (SMBH) and their host galaxies (cf Magorrian et al 1998; Haring & Rix 2004; Ferrarese & Merritt 2000; Gebhardt et al 2000) has stimulated significant efforts to identify the underlying physics (see Kormendy & Ho 2013 and King & Pounds 2015 for reviews of observations and theory respectively). These have thrown up a range of ideas, some involving the potential effects of merger averaging, or stellar feedback. The coevolution of black holes and galaxies is more complex than the simple picture sketched above, and our aim here is to clarify this

SMBH MASS EVOLUTION
SMBH growth in evolving galaxies
SMBH Growth Beyond Mmax?
CONCLUSIONS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.