Abstract

Superior vena cava (SVC) flow has been considered a surrogate marker of systemic blood flow in neonates. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate association between low SVC flow recorded during the early neonatal period and neonatal outcomes. We searched the following databases (until Dec 9, 2020; updated October 21, 2022): PROSPERO, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, Cochrane Library (CDSR and Central), Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global, and SCOPUS using controlled vocabulary and key words representing the concepts "superior vena cava" and "flow" and "neonate". Results were exported to COVIDENCE review management software. The search retrieved 593 records after removal of duplicates, of which 11 studies (9 cohorts) met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies included infants born at <30 weeks of gestation. The included studies were assessed as high risk of bias in terms of incomparability of the study groups, with infants in low SVC flow group noted to be more immature than those in the normal SVC flow group or subjected to different co-interventions. We did not conduct meta-analyses in view of significant clinical heterogeneity noted in the included studies. We found little evidence to suggest that SVC flow in early neonatal period is an independent predictor for adverse clinical outcomes in preterm infants. Included studies were assessed at high risk of bias. SVC flow interpretation for prognostication or for making treatment decisions should be restricted to research setting for now. We highlight the need for strengthened methods in the future research studies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call