Superfetation in live-bearing fishes is not always the result of a morphological constraint.

Abstract

Superfetation is an unusual reproductive strategy that consists of the presence of multiple broods at different developmental stages within a single female. One hypothesis that was proposed to explain its adaptive significance suggests that, in fishes, superfetation is a response to selective pressures that promote a thin and streamlined body shape, such as high-velocity water systems. Superfetation may allow for reduction in ovary size and hence improve streamlining because superfetating females carry few large, full-term embryos at any given time. We tested this morphological constraint hypothesis using reproductive and morphological data from several populations of two viviparous fishes of the family Poeciliidae (Poeciliopsis gracilis and Poeciliopsis infans). We found no evidence to support the morphological constraint hypothesis. In both species the degree of superfetation varied as a function of a complex interaction between source population and female size, and this interpopulation variation was not associated with the velocity of the water current. Contrary to what we expected, females of P. gracilis with more streamlined bodies were observed in rivers where water velocity is slow or moderate. In P. infans the velocity of the water current did not predict variation in body shape. Our results are noteworthy because a previous study which focused on a congeneric species (Poeciliopsis turrubarensis) demonstrated strong support for this hypothesis. However, based on our evidence we conclude that the association among increased superfetation, streamlined morphologies, and fast-flowing environments is not a general rule and that the adaptive value of superfetation may differ among species.