Abstract

Abstract. Coherent scatter HF ionospheric radar systems such as SuperDARN offer a powerful experimental technique for the investigation of the magnetospheric substorm. However, a common signature in the early expansion phase is a loss of HF backscatter, which has limited the utility of the radar systems in substorm research. Such data loss has generally been attributed to either HF absorption in the D-region ionosphere, or the consequence of regions of very low ionospheric electric field. Here observations from a well-instrumented isolated substorm which resulted in such a characteristic HF radar data loss are examined to explore the impact of the substorm expansion phase on the HF radar system. The radar response from the SuperDARN Hankasalmi system is interpreted in the context of data from the EIS-CAT incoherent scatter radar systems and the IRIS Riometer at Kilpisjarvi, along with calculations of HF absorption for both IRIS and Hankasalmi and ray-tracing simulations. Such a study offers an explanation of the physical mechanisms behind the HF radar data loss phenomenon. It is found that, at least for the case study presented, the major cause of data loss is not HF absorption, but changes in HF propagation conditions. These result in the loss of many propagation paths for radar backscatter, but also the creation of some new, viable propagation paths. The implications for the use of the characteristics of the data loss as a diagnostic of the substorm process, HF communications channels, and possible radar operational strategies which might mitigate the level of HF radar data loss, are discussed.Key words. Ionosphere (ionosphere-magnetosphere interactions). Magnetospheric physics (storms and substorms). Radio science (radio wave propagation)

Highlights

  • Ionospheric radar systems are a powerful diagnostic of the spatial and temporal evolution of the ionospheric electro-jets during the substorm expansion phase

  • Rather than modelling the total absorption for each available point in time, along a fixed elevation angle, as was done for Ionospheric Studies (IRIS), we model the total absorption as a function of the radar backscatter elevation angle, using electron density profiles from two specific times, representing the conditions before substorm expansion phase onset and during the main interval of CUTLASS data loss during the substorm expansion phase

  • Data from the Hankasalmi HF radar, the EISCAT incoherent scatter radars and the IRIS riometer, combined with calculations of HF absorption and propagation have enabled a quantitative insight to be gained into the operational constraints put upon HF radar systems by changes in the ionosphere associated with substorm precipitation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prior to the data loss, strong radar backscatter returns are measured, and a reasonably uniform velocity field is observed, while IRIS measures very low absorption A more spatially extensive region of HF radar data loss is observed (Fig. 3g) At this time the absorption measured by IRIS has significantly increased, reaching ∼ 0.5 dB, and this enhanced absorption covers almost the entire IRIS field-of-view, it is strongest in the southeast (Fig. 3i). The increased electron density, extends consistently to altitudes below 95 km only after 23:04 UT (these altitudes correspond to magnetic latitudes of 68◦–70◦) This is co-incident (within the resolution of the data) with the second mid-latitude Pi2, and it is at this time when the second HF radar data loss interval starts at the highest latitudes (73◦), expanding to a latitude of 70◦ by 23:07 UT. Gauld et al.: HF radar propagation and absorption response to substorms 0.40

Modelling IRIS absorption
Modelling Hankasalmi absorption
Modelling Hankasalmi HF propagation
Findings
Discussion
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call