Abstract

Individuals can exhibit strong consistencies in behaviours across time and contexts, referred to as animal personalities. Yet studies linking personality differences measured in captivity to ecologically relevant social behaviours in the wild are sparse and contradictory. Here, we used wild superb fairy-wrens, Malurus cyaneus , to investigate whether two personality traits measured in short-term captivity (exploration and aggressiveness) predicted aggressiveness in the wild (measured as territory defence). We first identified behavioural phenotypes within our study population by temporarily capturing adult birds to measure their (1) emergence, activity and sector visits in a novel environment (exploration) and (2) aggression in response to mirror image stimulation (aggressiveness). We later simulated two conspecific intrusions within their territory using playback of vocalizations (female or male chatter song) within their territory, in a pairwise design. Both exploration and breeding status (breeder/dominant versus helper/subordinate) influenced the birds’ response to the simulated intrusions. Dominant individuals and individuals with extreme exploration phenotypes (i.e. fast or slow explorers) responded more strongly to playback compared to helpers or those with intermediate exploration phenotypes, respectively. However, aggressiveness measured in short-term captivity (mirror response) did not correlate with our measure of aggressiveness in the wild (playback response during territory defence). The personality matching of breeding pairs (whether their partner had a matching or mismatching exploration phenotype) also influenced playback response, as pairs with mismatching exploration phenotypes responded more strongly to conspecific intruders than pairs with similar phenotypes. Our results support a growing number of studies showing the importance of animal personalities for response strategies and social behaviours. • We explored associations between personality traits in wild superb fairy-wrens. • Birds with extreme exploration phenotypes were more aggressive against conspecifics. • Aggressiveness in captivity did not correlate with aggressiveness in the wild. • Pairs with mismatching exploration phenotypes responded more strongly to intruders. • Our results support the validity of personality in fitness-related contexts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call