Abstract

Relationships between health professionals and pharmaceutical manufacturers can unduly influence clinical practice. These relationships are the focus of global transparency efforts, including in Europe. We conducted a descriptive content analysis of the transparency provisions implemented by February 2017 in nine European Union (EU) countries concerning payments to health professionals, with duplicate independent coding of all data. Using an author-generated, semi-structured questionnaire, we collected information from each disclosure policy/code on: target industries, categories of healthcare professionals covered, scope of payments included, location and searchability of the disclosed data. Our analysis shows that although important improvements have been put in place in the past few years, significant gaps remain in disclosure requirements and their implementation. The situation differs substantially from country to country and the most striking differences are between governmental and self-regulatory approaches, especially with regard to the comprehensiveness of the disclosed data. In many cases, individuals can still opt out and reporting is incomplete, with common influential gifts such as food and drink excluded. Finally, in several countries data are only available as separate PDFs from companies, thus making the payment reports difficult to access and analyse. In order to overcome these gaps, minimum standards for disclosures should be implemented across Europe. All payments to healthcare professionals and organizations should be included, all health-related industries should be required to submit reports, and usability of disclosed data should be guaranteed.

Highlights

  • Financial ties between health professionals and pharmaceutical manufacturers have long been at the centre of international debate

  • We conducted a descriptive content analysis of the national transparency provisions implemented by February 2017 in nine European countries and the provisions in the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) code concerning payments to health professionals, with duplicate independent coding of all data, and any discrepancies resolved by consensus

  • The Code of the French industry association, Les Entreprises du médicament (LEEM), states that by applying the French law, it fulfils its obligations under the EFPIA Disclosure code.[9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Financial ties between health professionals and pharmaceutical manufacturers have long been at the centre of international debate. Pharmaceutical companies invest large sums of money to interact with health professionals; in 2013, 20 drug companies spent a total of $14.8 billion in promotion, including traditional detailing, journal advertising, e-promotion, and professional meetings.[1] Studies suggest that such relationships influence clinical practice and are associated with inappropriate and lower quality prescribing that can lead to negative effects on patient care and higher healthcare costs.[2,3] These concerns have led to a range of national policies aimed to ensure greater disclosure of payments to health professionals by pharmaceutical manufacturers. The aim of this study is to examine rules covering disclosure by pharmaceutical companies of their payments to health professionals in different European countries, in terms of comprehensiveness and ease of data access. We make recommendations for the types of minimum standards needed for more comprehensive reporting standards

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call