Abstract
We sought to investigate the clinical and immunologic features of adult patients sensitized to sunflower seed. A retrospective case series study of 117 consecutive patients (median age 32 yr) having positive sunflower seed-specific IgE was performed. Patients underwent skin tests and detection of specific IgE and if indicated, oral food challenges. Clinical allergy to sunflower seed was recognized in 28 patients (24%). Most had a history of atopic disease (26 patients; 93%) and nuts (21 patients; 75%) and Rosaceae fruits (15 patients; 54%) reactions. The onset of the symptoms occurred mostly in adulthood (23 patients; 82%). Fourteen patients (50%) suffered anaphylaxis, graded as moderate (13 patients) and severe (1 patient). Anaphylaxis most frequent symptoms were cutaneous and respiratory (12 patients; 86%), and 10 patients (71%) required emergency department visits. There was significant difference in skin test wheal size (median: 9 vs. 6 mm; p = 0,006) and sunflower seed-IgE level (median: 2.16 vs. 0.69 kUA/L; p = 0.001) between patients with proved clinical allergy and those who tolerated its ingestion. Skin testing reactivity to Artemisia pollen was found to be more frequent in clinical allergic patients (71% vs. 22%, p = 0.021). No differences were found on LTP or other pollens sensitization rates. Half of the patients with actual clinical allergy to sunflower seed experienced anaphylaxis. The size of skin testing, sunflower seed-IgE level, and reactivity to Artemisia pollen seems to be associated with clinical reactivity. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of sunflower seed sensitization.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.