Summary of virtual tumor board platforms and implementation in neuro-oncology.

Abstract

e13604 Background: Virtual tumor board [VTB] platforms are an important aspect of cancer management. They enable easier access to a multidisciplinary team of experts. VTBs are an emerging resource across various cancer care networks in the United States. Methods: We performed a systematic search of all VTBs incorporating a platform designed for this specific role. We reviewed Xcures, Genomet, Oncolens, Navify Tumor Board, Medical University of South Carolina [MUSC] Virtual Tumor Board, Virtual Tumor Board Tahoe Forest Cancer Center, UC Davis Health Care Center VTB and MassiveBio. Summary data examined include year of launch, demographics, characteristics of cases, average response time, advantages, and how they handle protected health information. Results: 30% of all VTBs examined launched in 2017. All had a HIPAA compliant online environment. Xcures records were reviewed where the median age of female patients was 57yrs and the median age of male patients was 55 years. The data showed that 44% (4.4 out of every 10 patients) with a confirmed treatment chose VTB integrated option. 76% of patients in Xcures registry consist primary CNS tumors. With at least 556 patients in tumor registry which included 46% Glioblastoma cases [96% primary;, 4% secondary], 13% Diffuse midline glioma with H3K27M-mutant cases, 5% Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma cases, 3% Astrocytoma and Diffuse Astrocytoma cases, 3% Anaplastic astrocytoma cases; Glioma and Diffuse Glioma, 1% Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma cases and < 1% Gliosarcoma, Oligodendroglioma, Pilocytic astrocytoma, Anaplastic pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma, Fibrillary astrocytoma, Oligoastrocytoma and Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma cases. In the MUSC VTB, 9 neuro-oncology cases were reviewed. They meet weekly, and average response time was within 24hrs of case review.Patient demographics were not recorded. Genomet Virtual Board de-identifies all patient information; this is a virtual platform primarily focused on neuro-oncology cases. Cases involved a median of 5 specialist most commonly neuro-oncologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, molecular pathologists and neuroradiologists. Participants had an average of 23 cases reviewed. Case review revealed an age range from 6 months to 84 years [mean age 44.5 years] with 69.6% males and 30.4% females, 43.5% glioblastoma, 8.7% adenocarcinoma, 8.7% infra-tentorial tumor, < 5% each: pineoblastoma, melanoma, hemangioblastoma and pilocytic astrocytoma. Average response time observed in all cases was ≤24 hours. Detailed metrics for number/percentages of brain tumor cases were not available for most other platforms at time of submission. This will be updated at presentation. Conclusions: VTBs have allowed for quicker expert analysis of cases. This has resulted in an accelerated number of cases reviewed with a shortened communication time. More studies are needed to gain additional insight into user engagement