Abstract

Subunit and split virus inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) are two commonly used types of seasonal influenza vaccines in Canada. The comparative effectiveness of these two formulations is particularly relevant for older adults, as older adults have reduced influenza vaccine effectiveness and experience more severe influenza than younger adults. To compare the vaccine effectiveness and immunogenicity of unadjuvanted, standard-dose subunit IIVs versus unadjuvanted, standard-dose split virus IIVs in adults 65 years of age and older. An a priori written protocol based on rapid review methods was developed that included studies published in 2007 or later in the EMBASE, MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov databases with terms used in the objective. Due to the small number of records returned, hand searches of reference lists were completed, the publication date limit was removed, three additional databases (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched, and studies including adults 60 years of age and older were included. Data from included studies were extracted into evidence tables and quality assessments were completed. The results were synthesized narratively. Eight eligible studies were identified. In the three studies that assessed vaccine effectiveness of subunit and split virus IIVs, there were no statistically significant differences in vaccine effectiveness in adults 65 years of age and older against laboratory-confirmed infection with any influenza virus strain, or against laboratory-confirmed infection with influenza A(H1N1), A(H3N2) or B virus, specifically. In the five studies that assessed immunogenicity, the findings were not consistent and the overall quality of immunogenicity evidence was weak. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) concludes that there is insufficient evidence to determine significant differences in the vaccine effectiveness or immunogenicity of unadjuvanted, standard-dose subunit and split virus IIVs in adults 65 years of age and older (Grade I evidence).

Highlights

  • Many different technologies are currently used in the formulation of influenza vaccines

  • Split virus and subunit inactivated influenza vaccines, both consisting of disrupted virus particles, were some of the first technologies developed following early inactivated whole virus vaccines, which were developed in the 1940s [1]

  • Split virus vaccines contain whole inactivated viruses that have been split with detergent, ether, or both, while subunit vaccines are made of purified hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many different technologies are currently used in the formulation of influenza vaccines. Split virus and subunit inactivated influenza vaccines, both consisting of disrupted virus particles, were some of the first technologies developed following early inactivated whole virus vaccines, which were developed in the 1940s [1]. Newer technologies and formulations for influenza vaccines have since been introduced, such as higher doses of antigen or combining the antigen with adjuvants; standard-dose subunit and split virus inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) are still the most commonly used seasonal influenza vaccines, as these vaccines have well-established safety profiles and are less expensive than newer formulations. A large number of the seasonal influenza vaccines available for use in Canada are standard-dose subunit or split virus IIVs [2]. Subunit and split virus inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) are two commonly used types of seasonal influenza vaccines in Canada. The comparative effectiveness of these two formulations is relevant for older adults, as older adults have reduced influenza vaccine effectiveness and experience more severe influenza than younger adults

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call