Abstract

A large number of seismic observation data and macroscopic survey of earthquake damage indicate that soil site may amplify the intensity of ground-motion and thus aggravate the damage to the structures on the soil site[1]. The influence of site response on ground motion is one of the most important topics in earthquake engineering. The methods of predicting the site effects can be divided into two groups with respect to theoretical methods and empirical methods. The theoretical methods of predicting site effects are to analyse the site response to ground motion based on the theory of seismic wave propagation in which the detailed soil information is required. Whereas the empirical methods predicting the site effects by empirical prediction model which is determined using observed seismic data or ground pulsation data. According to whether the reference site is introduced, the empirical methods can be further divided into the reference site method and the non-reference site method. This article introduces in detail the principles, advantages and disadvantages of various methods of analysing site effects, which is of reference value for further research on site ground motion response.

Highlights

  • Through the analysis of seismic observation data and the investigation of earthquake damage, we can know that the intensity of ground motion is closely related to the geological conditions of the shallow overburden layer, and the local site response may enlarge or reduce the intensity of ground motion, which directly affects the degree of earthquake damage[2]

  • Theretical method The existing seismic response analysis methods of soil layer can be roughly divided into equivalent linearization method in frequency domain and nonlinear method in time domain

  • The study of site effect can be divided into theoretical method and empirical method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Through the analysis of seismic observation data and the investigation of earthquake damage, we can know that the intensity of ground motion is closely related to the geological conditions of the shallow overburden layer, and the local site response may enlarge or reduce the intensity of ground motion, which directly affects the degree of earthquake damage[2]. As early as the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, researchers found that the damage degree of buildings on soft sediments was 5-10 times higher than that of similar buildings about a mile away but built on hard soil or rock[3]. The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake with Ms7.0 shows that the soft soil site has a significant amplification effect on the ground motion[5, 6], the peak ground acceleration of bedrock site and soft soil site in San Francisco Auckland area are about 0.08g and 0.20g respectively. Compared with the bedrock site in San Francisco Bay, the seismic intensities of treasure island and Auckland soft soil site are more than three times larger[6, 7]. The ground motion on the thick overburden layer in the San Francisco Bay area

Research status
Formatting the text
Traditional spectrum ratio method
Generalized Inversion Technique
HVSR method
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call