Abstract
The objective of this paper is to show that both the archaeological method and the genealogical method developed by Michel Foucault do not provide an appropriate approach to think the resistance of subjectivity nor it is possible to explain it from those perspectives for the lack of appropriate theoretical devices. Thus, it is necessary to go against those who see both methods either as totally different or as a part of an evolutionary process in the thought of Foucault. It is argued that the impossibility to think seriously the resistance lays down in the fact that the French thinker was involved in a tradition which aim was to undermine the Humanist, Existentialist and Phenomenological philosophies. To expose this problem in the thought of Foucault, some of Judith Butler’s ideas are recovered to show the necessity of thinking the resistance as a constitutive part of the process of configuration of the subjectivity. This does not mean to abandon the Foucauldian thought, but to make it more complex by looking its weak points.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.