Abstract

Satellite-based precipitation products with high spatial and temporal resolution and large areal coverage offer a potential alternative or supplement to ground-based rainfall estimates over sparsely gauged or ungauged basins. The original intention of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) was to provide rainfall products over the global tropics. Although numerous efforts have been made to evaluate the applicability of TRMM precipitation in the low altitude of the tropics and the mid-latitudes, its applicability in high altitude is rare. The source region of Yellow River and its neighbor regions in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau provide a good example of high altitude and higher latitude for this purpose. In this study, we first provided a quantitative assessment of the TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) products (3B42V6) against the gauge rainfall from 1998 to 2008. In general, the TMPA rainfall captures the spatial and temporal rainfall characteristics less well over the region on daily time scales. However, the monthly TMPA data have a much better linear relationship with the gauge rainfall data with a high determination coefficient (R2) of 0.96. The distribution of the barycentre of the precipitation concentrates on the south-central of the study area, and the TMPA rainfall scatter in the west in comparison with the gauge rainfall. This study also concluded that the validation indices of TMPA were closely associated with latitude and annual precipitation. We subsequently evaluated the utility of the TMPA rainfall for daily and monthly hydrological process simulation by applying the rainfall data to a raster-based distributed hydrological model, Coupled Routing and Excess Storage (CREST). The results showed that the conventional areal rainfall based on gauge data produces an overall good fit, while the TMPA-driven simulations tend to yield an unsatisfied result in the daily discharge simulations. This analysis implies that TMPA cannot be acceptable to drive hydrological models for daily stream flow simulation in the study area. However, at the monthly time scale, the TMPA rainfall performs quite well. This study concluded that TMPA is more suitable for the long-term hydrological prediction.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.