Abstract

To investigate the suitability of the microDiamond detector (mDD) type 60019 (PTW-Freiburg, Germany) to measure the anisotropy function F(r,θ) of High Dose Rate (HDR) 192 Ir brachytherapy sources. The HDR 192 Ir brachytherapy source, model mHDR-v2r (Elekta AB, Sweden), was placed inside a water tank within a 4F plastic needle. Four mDDs (mDD1, mDD2, mDD3, and mDD4) were investigated. Each mDD was placed laterally with respect to the source, and measurements were performed at radial distances r=1cm, 3 and 5cm, and polar angles θ from 0° to 168°. The Monte Carlo (MC) system EGSnrc was used to simulate the measurements and to calculate phantom effect, energy dependence and volume-averaging correction factors. F(r,θ) was determined according to TG-43 formalism from the detector reading corrected with the MC-based factors and compared to the consensus anisotropy function CON F(r,θ). At 1cm, the differences between measurements and MC simulations ranged from -0.8% to +0.8% for θ=0° and from -2.1% to+2.3% for θ≠0°. At 3 and 5cm, the differences ranged from +1.4% to +3.9% for θ=0°, and from -0.4% to +2.9% for θ≠0°. All differences were within the uncertainties (k=2). At small angles, the phantom effect correction was up to -1.9%. This effect was mainly caused by the air between source and needle tip. The energy correction was angle-independent everywhere. For small angles at 1cm, the volume-averaging correction was up to -2.9% and became less important for larger angles and distances. The differences of the measured F(r,θ) corrected with the MC-based factors to CON F(r,θ) ranged from -1.0% to +3.4% for mDD1, -2.2% to +4.2% for mDD2, -2.5% to +4.0% for mDD3, and -2.6% to +3.4% for mDD4. All differences were within the uncertainties (k=2) except one at (3cm, 0°). For all the mDDs, F(r,0°) was always higher than CON F(r,0°), with average differences of +3.1% (1cm), +3.6% (3cm), and +1.9% (5cm). The inter-detector variability was within 2.9% (1cm), 1.8% (3cm), and 3.4% (5cm). A reproducible method and experimental setup were presented for measuring and validating F(r,θ) of an HDR 192 Ir brachytherapy source in a water phantom using the mDD. The phantom effect and the volume-averaging need to be taken into account, especially for the smaller distances and angles. Good agreement to CON F(r,θ) was obtained. The discrepancies at (1cm, 0°), accurately predicted by the MC results, may suggest a reconsideration of CON F(r,θ), at least for this position. The slight overestimations at (3cm,0°) and (5cm,0°), both in comparison to CON F(r,θ) and MC results, may be due to an underestimation of the air volume between source and needle tip, dark current, intrinsic over-response of the mDDs, or radiation-induced charge imbalance in the detector's components. The results indicate that the mDD is a valuable tool for measurements with HDR 192 Ir brachytherapy sources and support its employment for the determination and validation of TG-43 parameters of such sources.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call