Abstract

In the simulation of compressible turbulent flows via a high-order flux reconstruction framework, the artificial viscosity model plays an important role to ensure robustness in the strongly compressible region. However, the impact of the artificial viscosity model in under-resolved regions on dissipation features or resolving ability remains unclear. In this work, the performance of a dilation-based (DB) artificial viscosity model to simulate under-resolved turbulent flows in a high-order flux reconstruction (FR) framework is investigated. Comparison is conducted with results via several typical explicit subgrid scale (SGS) models as well as implicit large eddy simulation (iLES) and their impact on important diagnostic quantities including turbulent kinetic energy, total dissipation rate of kinetic energy, and energy spectra are discussed. The dissipation rate of kinetic energy is decomposed into several components including those resulting from explicit SGS models or Laplacian artificial viscosity model; thus, an explicit evaluation of the dissipation rate led by those modeling terms is presented. The test cases consist of the Taylor-Green vortex (TGV) problem at Re=1600, the freely decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence (HIT) at Mat0=0.5 (the initial turbulent Mach number ), the compressible TGV at Mach number 1.25 and the compressible channel flow at Reb= 15,334 (the bulk Reynolds number based on bulk density, bulk velocity and half-height of the channel), Mach number 1.5. The first two cases show that the DB model behaves similarly to the SGS models in terms of dissipation and has the potential to improve the insufficient dissipation of iLES with the fourth-order-accurate FR method. The last two cases further demonstrate the ability of the DB method on compresssible under-resolved turbulence and/or wall-bounded turbulence. The results of this work suggest the general suitability of the DB model to simulate under-resolved compressible turbulence in the high order flux reconstruction framework and also suggest some future work on controlling the potential excessive dissipation caused by the dilation term.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.