Abstract

Unicellular organisms can engage in a process by which a cell purposefully destroys itself, termed programmed cell death (PCD). While it is clear that the death of specific cells within a multicellular organism could increase inclusive fitness (e.g., during development), the origin of PCD in unicellular organisms is less obvious. Kin selection has been shown to help maintain instances of PCD in existing populations of unicellular organisms; however, competing hypotheses exist about whether additional factors are necessary to explain its origin. Those factors could include an environmental shift that causes latent PCD to be expressed, PCD hitchhiking on a large beneficial mutation, and PCD being simply a common pathology. Here, we present results using an artificial life model to demonstrate that kin selection can, in fact, be sufficient to give rise to PCD in unicellular organisms. Furthermore, when benefits to kin are direct—that is, resources provided to nearby kin—PCD is more beneficial than when benefits are indirect—that is, nonkin are injured, thus increasing the relative amount of resources for kin. Finally, when considering how strict organisms are in determining kin or nonkin (in terms of mutations), direct benefits are viable in a narrower range than indirect benefits.Open Research Badges This article has been awarded Open Data and Open Materials Badges. All materials and data are publicly accessible via the Open Science Framework at https://github.com/anyaevostinar/SuicidalAltruismDissertation/tree/master/LongTerm.

Highlights

  • In programmed cell death, a cell destroys itself through internally controlled processes (Nedelcu, Driscoll, Durand, Herron, & Rashidi, 2011)

  • We have shown in this work that programmed cell death can evolve due to kin selection under conditions where it otherwise would not have evolved

  • We found that accurate kin discrimination was necessary for kin selection to evolve programmed cell death

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A cell destroys itself through internally controlled processes (Nedelcu, Driscoll, Durand, Herron, & Rashidi, 2011). Many types of behavior resembling programmed cell death have been identified in unicellular organisms (Koonin & Aravind, 2002). This sit‐ uation is less clear given that programmed cell death in a unicellular organism kills the entire organism, eliminating any direct selective pressure for this trait. This observation raises the question: How can programmed cell death evolve at all in unicellular organisms?

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call