Abstract
Purpose:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interfractional and intrafractional motion of liver tumors in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), based on four‐dimensional cone‐beam computed tomography using fiducial markers. (4D‐CBCT).Methods:Seven patients with liver tumors were treated by SBRT with abdominal compression (AC) in five fractions with image guidance based on 4D‐CBCT. The 4D‐CBCT studies were performed to determine the individualized internal margin for the planning simulation. The interfractional and intrafractional changes of liver tumor motion for all patients was measured, based on the planning simulation 4D‐CBCT, pre‐SBRT 4D‐CBCT, and post‐SBRT 4D‐CBCT. The interfractional motion change was calculated from the difference in liver tumor amplitude on pre‐SBRT 4D‐CBCT relative to that of the planning simulation 4D‐CBCT for each fraction. The intrafractional motion change was calculated from the difference between the liver tumor amplitudes of the pre‐ and post‐SBRT 4D‐CBCT for each fraction. Significant interfractional and intrafractional changes in liver tumor motion were defined as a change ≥3 mm. Statistical analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation.Results:The values of the mean amplitude of liver tumor, as indicated by planning simulation 4D‐CBCT, were 1.6 ± 0.8 mm, 1.6 ± 0.9 mm, and 4.9 ± 2.2 mm in the left‐right (LR), anterior‐posterior (AP), and superior‐inferior (SI) directions, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients between the liver tumor amplitudes, based on planning simulation 4D‐CBCT, and pre‐SBRT 4D‐CBCT during fraction treatment in the LR, AP, and SI directions were 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8, respectively. Interfractional and intrafractional motion changes of ≥3 mm occurred in 23% and 3% of treatment fractions, respectively.Conclusion:The interfractional and intrafractional changes of liver tumor motion were small in most patients who received liver SBRT with AC. In addition, planning simulation 4D‐CBCT was useful for representing liver tumor movement in patients undergoing SBRT.This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26861004.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
