SU‐F‐J‐85: Evaluation of the Velocity Deformable Image Registration Algorithm

Abstract

Purpose:To perform validation and commissioning of a commercial deformable image registration (DIR) algorithm (Velocity, Varian Medical Systems) for numerous clinical sites using single and multi‐modality images.Methods:In this retrospective study, the DIR algorithm was evaluated for 10 patients in each of the following body sites: head and neck (HN), prostate, liver, and gynecological (GYN). HN DIRs were evaluated from planning (p)CT to re‐pCT and pCTs to daily CBCTs using dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of corresponding anatomical structures. Prostate DIRs were evaluated from pCT to CBCTs using DSC and target registration error (TRE) of implanted RF beacons within the prostate. Liver DIRs were evaluated from pMR to pCT using DSC and TRE of vessel bifurcations. GYN DIRs were evaluated between fractionated brachytherapy MRIs using DSC of corresponding anatomical structures.Results:Analysis to date has given average DSCs for HN pCT‐to‐(re)pCT DIR for the brainstem, cochleas, constrictors, spinal canal, cord, esophagus, larynx, parotids, and submandibular glands as 0.88, 0.65, 0.67, 0.91, 0.77, 0.69, 0.77, 0.87, and 0.71, respectively. Average DSCs for HN pCT‐to‐CBCT DIR for the constrictors, spinal canal, esophagus, larynx, parotids, and submandibular glands were 0.64, 0.90, 0.62, 0.82, 0.75, and 0.69, respectively. For prostate pCT‐to‐CBCT DIR the DSC for the bladder, femoral heads, prostate, and rectum were 0.71, 0.82, 0.69, and 0.61, respectively. Average TRE using implanted beacons was 3.35 mm. For liver pCT‐to‐pMR, the average liver DSC was 0.94 and TRE was 5.26 mm. For GYN MR‐to‐MR DIR the DSC for the bladder, sigmoid colon, GTV, and rectum were 0.79, 0.58, 0.67, and 0.76, respectively.Conclusion:The Velocity DIR algorithm has been evaluated over a number of anatomical sites. This work functions to document the uncertainties in the DIR in the commissioning process so that these can be accounted for in the development of downstream clinical processes.This work was supported in part by a co‐development agreement with Varian Medical Systems