SU‐F‐I‐72: Evaluation of the Ancillary Lead Shielding for Optimizing Radiation Protection in the Interventional Radiology Department

Abstract

Purpose:The rising complexity of interventional fluoroscopic procedures has resulted in an increase of occupational radiation exposures in the interventional radiology (IR) department. This study assessed the impact of ancillary shielding on optimizing radiation protection for the IR staff.Methods:Scattered radiation measurements were performed in two IR suites equipped with Axiom Artis systems (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) installed in 2006 and 2010. Both rooms had suspended ceiling‐mounted lead‐acrylic shields of 75×60 cm (Mavig, Munich, Germany) with lead equivalency of 0.5 mm, and under‐table drapes of 70×116 cm and 65×70 cm in the newer and the older room respectively. The larger skirt can be wrapped around the table's corner and in addition the newer suite had two upper shields of 25×55 cm and 25×35 cm. The patient was simulated by 30 cm of acrylic, air kerma rate (AKR) was measured with the 180cc ionization chamber (AccuPro Radcal Corporation, Monrovia, CA, USA) at different positions. The ancillary shields, x‐ray tube, image detector, and table height were adjusted by the IR radiologist to simulate various clinical setups. The same exposure parameters were used for all acquisitions. AKR measurements were made at different positions relative to the operator.Results:The AKR measurements demonstrated 91–99% x‐ray attenuation by the drapes in both suites. The smaller size of the under‐table skirt and absence of the side‐drapes in the older room resulted in a 20–50 fold increase of scattered radiation to the operator. The mobile suspended lead‐acrylic shield reduced AKR by 90–94% measured at 150–170 cm height. The recommendations were made to replace the smaller under‐table skirt and to use the ceiling‐mounted shields for all IR procedures.Conclusion:The ancillary shielding may significantly affect radiation exposure to the IR staff. The use of suspended ceiling‐mounted shields is especially important for reduction of interventional radiologists’ cranial radiation.