Abstract

The American quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and its close relative, the Eurasian quaking aspen (Populus tremula L.), cover a realm that is perhaps the most expansive of all tree species in the world. In North America, sudden aspen decline (SAD) is a growing concern that marks the rapid decline of quaking aspen trees leading to mortality at the stand and landscape scale. Research suggests that drought and water stress are the primary causes of SAD. Predisposing factors (age, structure, and landscape position), as well as associated stressors (i.e., pests and pathogens), have been linked to mortality in affected stands. The conflation of multiple interacting factors across the aspen’s broad geographic range in North America has produced significant debate over the classification of SAD as a disease and the proper management of affected stands. Interestingly, no such effects have been reported for the Eurasian aspen. We here review and synthesize the growing body of literature for North America and suggest that SAD is a novel decline disease resulting from multiple inciting and interacting factors related to climate, land-use history, and successional dynamics. We suggest that the range of aspen observed at the onset of the 21st Century was bolstered by a wet period in western North America that coincided with widespread regional cutting and clearing of late-successional forests for timber and grazing. No comparable land-use history, successional status, or age-class structure is apparent or linked for Eurasian forests. Eurasian aspen is either absent or young in managed forests, or old and decadent in parks in Fenno-Scandinavia, or it grows more intimately with a more diverse mixture of tree species that have arisen from a longer period of frequent timber cutting in Russia. Based on these insights we provide recommendations for practical management techniques that can promote stand resilience and recovery across a range of stand conditions in North America. Managers should attempt to identify SAD-prone stands using the presence of predisposing conditions and focus treatments such as coppice or prescribed fire on stands with suitable topographies, elevations, and climates. We conclude that SAD will persist throughout the coming decades, given the enormity of past cutting history, fire exclusion, and current changes in climate until a more active restoration agenda is implemented.

Highlights

  • Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx., hereinafter aspen) is the most widely distributed tree species in North America [1]

  • Most past studies of sudden aspen decline (SAD) have focused on observational studies that rely on detecting large landscape-scale disturbance as the primary mechanism to assess stand dynamics of aspen [71,72,73,74]

  • Sudden aspen decline is a novel decline disease complex induced by drought and exacerbated by a variety of factors—including stand structure, land-use history, secondary pathogen attack, topography, and inter- and intra-specific competition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx., hereinafter aspen) is the most widely distributed tree species in North America [1]. Over the last fifteen years, forest managers in North America have increasingly observed the rapid decline of otherwise healthy aspen stands throughout large parts of its expansive range [8,9]. No such decline has been reported in Eurasia, where forests are much more intensively managed [10]. The objective of our paper is to clarify the presence and cause of SAD in North America by synthesizing pre-existing research on the topic, to make management recommendations, and suggest why this appears not to be of importance in Eurasia This topic has implications for continental-scale landscape changes to forest cover that will continue to rapidly change North American forests in the coming decades. We structure our review first with an explanation of SAD, discuss the main predisposing and contributing factors of SAD, assess future conditions through remote sensing and models, and make management recommendations

Explaining Normal Patterns of Aspen Mortality versus SAD
Predisposing Factors to Sudden Aspen Decline
Edaphic and Topographic Conditions
Primary and Secondary Insects
Methods
Key Findings
Literature review
Primary and Secondary Pathogens
Proneness to Cavitation and Drought
Photosynthate Allocation and Carbon Storage
Climate Models and Changes in Aspen Range
Detecting Changes in SAD through Remote Sensing
Management Implications
Coppice Systems
Prescribed Fire
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call