Abstract
This article reflects the scientific research on court decisions in criminal procedure law. Recognition of court decisions in criminal cases as evidence is shown to be strict for other courts as well as for the bodies of preliminary investigation and inquiry. There is no prejudice in our current criminal procedure legislation. In this regard, the study of the legal system of foreign countries is characterized by the interdependence of the issues of prejudice and precedent, the negative and positive aspects of which are shown in the example of national legislation. This article explains the prejudicial significance of court decisions in the use of evidence and proof, and the procedures for their use. It should be noted that this article scientifically substantiates the pre-trial practical and theoretical expression of evidence in the collection, examination and evaluation of evidence in pre-trial investigation, inquiry, preliminary investigation and trial. It stipulates that the legislature shall determine the nature, direction and content of criminal proceedings by special rules. Different views on the prejudicial significance of the evidence and the mechanisms for its recognition have been expressed by the higher courts in the form of controversy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
